St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy

What is this page?

We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy.

What is Locrating?

Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews, neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy.

To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy on our interactive map.

About St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy


Name St Francis RC Primary School, A Voluntary Academy
Inspections
Ofsted Inspections
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Mrs Lynn Elder
Address Ellenbrook Close, Gorton, Manchester, M12 5LZ
Phone Number 01612233457
Phase Academy
Type Academy sponsor led
Age Range 3-11
Religious Character Roman Catholic
Gender Mixed
Number of Pupils Unknown
Local Authority Manchester
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.

What is it like to attend this school?

Over time, leaders have not ensured that pupils at St Francis Roman Catholic Primary School receive an acceptable standard of education. From the early years, through to the end of Year 6, the curriculum is poorly designed and weakly implemented.

Pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), do not gain the knowledge that they need to be successful. Consequently, pupils across the school are not ready for the next stage of their education.

Pupils are happy in school.

They come into school with a smile, keen to get on with their learning. They are friendly and welcoming to each other and to visitors. Pupils are proud to hol...d additional responsibilities, such as chaplains or as head boy or girl.

They make a positive contribution to the school community.

Most leaders and teachers expect pupils to behave well. Many pupils do.

However, some pupils choose not to follow the school rules. Incidents of poorer behaviour are not managed as well as they should be by some staff. This means that pupils' learning is sometimes disrupted.

Pupils feel safe in school. They feel confident to share their worries with trusted adults. Pupils know what constitutes bullying.

When such incidents occur, leaders deal with them effectively.

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Until very recently, leaders have not paid enough attention to the curriculum. Although leaders have started to think about how to improve the curriculum, it remains in a state of disarray across the school.

The early years curriculum does not help children to learn all that they should in readiness for Year 1. The curriculum for pupils in Years 1 to 6 lacks coherence. Leaders have not set out what pupils should learn in different subjects.

Little consideration is given to the order in which knowledge will be taught. This means that pupils do not have the knowledge that they need to be successful in their future learning. Pupils do not remember what they have learned.

Their achievement across a range of subjects, including English and mathematics, is weak.

Without any real curriculum guidance, teachers do not have the support that they need to design learning that helps pupils to build their knowledge over time. Pupils' learning is disconnected and jumbled as a result.

Teachers do not use assessment strategies effectively. They do not know what they should be checking. This means that gaps in knowledge are not dealt with well enough.

Pupils develop misconceptions in many subjects.

Leaders and teachers do not have high enough expectations for pupils with SEND. Their needs are not identified clearly to ensure that these pupils receive the support that they need to be successful.

Teachers do not know how to shape their teaching, so that pupils with SEND can progress through the curriculum. Pupils with SEND do not achieve well.

Leaders do not ensure that pupils learn to read as well as they should.

The phonics programme is not delivered consistently well across the early years and key stage 1. This is because staff do not have the subject knowledge that they need to deliver the programme effectively. They teach incorrect sounds and they do not make sure that pupils read books that match the sounds and letters that they know.

As a result, pupils do not systematically build their phonics knowledge over time. This hinders their fluency, accuracy and confidence. Leaders do not place enough importance on helping pupils to catch up.

This means that many pupils enter key stage 2 without the reading knowledge that they need to support their learning or to just enjoy reading for pleasure.

Most pupils behave well in school. This typically helps to create an orderly environment.

However, some pupils do not behave as well as they should. Some staff accept low-level disruption in lessons as the norm. This interrupts the learning of others.

During social times, some pupils' enjoyment of playing with their friends is marred by the boisterous behaviour of others. Staff do not tackle such behaviour effectively. This means that it continues.

The curriculum to develop pupils' personal development is a small step ahead of the rest of the curriculum. Recently, leaders have developed the curriculum, so that pupils learn more about different types of relationships. They have a better understanding that families come in many different forms.

Pupils also have some knowledge of fundamental British values, but their understanding of what these values mean is less secure. However, due to weaknesses in the past, some pupils still have gaps in their learning. This means that they are not fully prepared for life in modern Britain.

Pupils know different ways to keep themselves physically and mentally healthy. They value the many sporting opportunities that they have. They enjoy representing the school at different competitions.

Governors have not kept a close enough eye on what has been happening at the school since the previous inspection. They are too ready to accept what leaders have told them. In a bid to strengthen governance, new governors have been appointed.

However, it is too soon to see the impact of this change.

The new headteacher and deputy headteacher recognise the significant weaknesses at the school. Governors and leaders have taken too much time to bring around improvement.

Some of the weaknesses have become engrained. Governors have not ensured that subject leaders within the school have had the training that they need to develop their ability to check how well pupils achieve in their subject.

Leaders consider staff's workload.

Most staff said that leaders support their well-being.

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

Leaders have implemented new procedures in school to keep pupils safe.

Staff receive training on how to spot signs that pupils might be at harm. They report these concerns to leaders. Leaders in turn work in partnership with outside agencies to ensure that pupils get the support that they need.

The curriculum provides opportunities for pupils to learn about different aspects of safety. For example, pupils are taught about how to keep themselves safe online.

What does the school need to do to improve?

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

• Governors have overseen a decline in every aspect of the school since the previous inspection.

This has led to pupils' weak achievement over time. Capacity to improve is poor. This is because many leaders do not have the skills that they need to bring about the improvement.

Governors must ensure they have the expertise and knowledge to hold leaders to account for the achievement of pupils in school. They must also strengthen leadership capacity within the school in order to tackle the weaknesses. ? Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum for all pupils, including children in early years, enables them to achieve well.

Pupils do not gain the knowledge that they need to be successful. Leaders must ensure that there is a well ordered and ambitious curriculum that prepares pupils well for the next stage of their education. ? Teachers do not know what they should teach or how best to deliver subject content.

They are ill-equipped to check pupils' learning and spot misconceptions. As a result, pupils do not build their knowledge over time and gaps in their understanding go unchecked. Leaders must ensure that teachers have the guidance and training that they need to design learning that helps pupils to learn all that they should know.

• Pupils, including children in the early years, do not gain a secure knowledge of phonics. This means that they do not become fluent or confident readers by the end of key stage 1. This hinders their access to the key stage 2 curriculum.

Leaders must ensure that staff deliver the early reading programme consistently well and that pupils receive the support that they need to catch up by the time they leave Year 2. ? Pupils with SEND do not achieve well. Their needs are not identified well enough.

Teachers do not know how to meet their needs or how best to support their progress through the curriculum. Leaders must ensure that teachers receive the training that they need to support pupils with SEND to achieve well. ? Subject leaders do not keep a close enough check on their subject.

This means that they do not know how well their curriculum is being implemented. Subject leaders do not know how well pupils are achieving in their subject. Leaders should ensure that they develop subject leaders' skills in keeping a check on how well their subject curriculum is being implemented and what impact it is having on pupils' achievement.

• Some pupils do not behave in lessons as they should do. Staff do not ensure that pupils have a positive attitude towards their learning. Staff too readily accept low-level disruption.

This means that some pupils do not learn as effectively as they should do. Leaders must ensure that staff expectations for behaviour increases, so that low-level behaviour is not tolerated.

Leaders and those responsible for governance may not appoint early career teachers before the next monitoring inspection.


  Compare to
nearby schools